Absentee Ballots Disinformation

Get the full experience

Get a free account to upload audio, video and image files and save history.

Is this Real?

Downloading media

0.0 MB · 0%

An analyst reviewed this: Fake.

States are responsible for sending ballots, not Pentagon Also marked misleading — deceptive editing or staging.

reuters.com/fact-check/states-responsible-sending-ballots-military-voters-not-pentagon-2024-11-05/

Verifiable claim in the image

Direct upload · IMG_0206.png

AnalyzedTue, Nov 5, 2024

Detector time22m 51s

File.png1.3MB

Disclaimer: truemedia.georgetown.edu uses state-of-the-art academic AI methods. However, errors can occur.

TrueMedia

Media Analysis Report · An open-source research project of Georgetown University

3tb1MFbj0guohcaYDE72qGaw9DM.png

Tue, Nov 5, 2024

Preliminary — analyses are still in progress; the verdict and signal below may change

Low Manipulation Signal

LowManipulation possibility

File: .png · 1.3MB
Scope: Image
Source: http://truemedia-fileuploads.org/3tb1MFbj0guohcaYDE72qGaw9DM.png/IMG_0206.png
Analyzed: Tue, Nov 5, 2024 · 22m 51s
Detector agreement: None completed

Detector	Model	Result

Disclaimer: truemedia.georgetown.edu uses state-of-the-art academic AI methods. However, errors can occur.

TrueMedia · Media Analysis Report — Interpretation

3tb1MFbj0guohcaYDE72qGaw9DM.png

Verdict tiers

Little Evidence	Low possibility of manipulation
Conflicting Evidence	Moderate possibility of manipulation
Substantial Evidence	High possibility of manipulation

Manipulation possibility scale

Low

0–20

Noticeable

20–33

Moderate

33–67

Strong

67–85

Nearly certain

85–100

This analysis: Low manipulation possibility. This reports how strongly the detectors flagged this media — it is not a probability that the media is manipulated. The verdict itself is determined by TrueMedia's vote-based aggregation of detector results.

Methodology

Each detector listed on page 1 independently analyzes the media for signs of AI generation or manipulation. TrueMedia aggregates the detector results into the overall verdict using a vote-based scheme in which trusted detectors carry extra weight; the manipulation possibility shown is a calibrated summary of the detector scores, reported as a strength rather than a probability. In this analysis, 0 of 0 completed detectors agreed with the final verdict.

Cite this analysis

@misc{truemedia2026,
  title        = {TrueMedia: Open-Source Media Manipulation Detection},
  author       = {{Georgetown University}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://truemedia.georgetown.edu}},
  note         = {Analysis 3tb1MFbj0guohcaYDE72qGaw9DM.png}
}