Is this real?
Substantial Evidence of Manipulation
TrueMedia.org verdict: substantial evidence of manipulation.
Verified by human analyst
Analysis
Results
Generative AI
Detects signatures of GenAI tools
Uncertain
Disclaimer: TrueMedia.org uses both leading vendors and state-of-the-art academic AI methods. However, errors can occur.
AI-Generated Insights
Our detector analyzed the media for signs of digital manipulation and noted the following insights. This AI-generated explanation is provided for additional context and is only one component of our analysis.
The image appears to be digitally manipulated. The text on the cookies looks unnaturally sharp and well-defined compared to the rest of the image, suggesting that it was added digitally. Additionally, the alignment and perspective of the text do not perfectly match the cookies' surfaces.
Generative AI5
Detects signatures of GenAI tools
Substantial Evidence
95% confidence Universal Fake Detector Analysis
Analyzes images to determine if they’re generated by a variety of autoregressive or other popularly used types of generative models.
Little Evidence
3% confidence AI Image Generator Analysis
Analyzes image for indications that it was generated by popular AI image generators, like MidJourney, Dall-E, Stable Diffusion and thispersondoesnotexist.com.
Little Evidence
AI-Generated Image Detector
Detects AI-generated images using a model trained on a large dataset composed of millions of human and artificially generated images sourced from across the web such as photographs, digital and traditional art, and memes.
Little Evidence
AI-Generated Image Detector
Detects AI-generated, photorealistic images created by Stable Diffusion, MidJourney, DALL·E 2 and others.
Not Applicable
Reverse Search Analysis
Uses reverse image search to obtain a source URL to analyze whether an image was generated by AI or otherwise digitally manipulated.
Details
.jpg
File type and size
161KB
Processing time
Time to analyze media
17m 52s
Analyzed on
When media was analyzed
Sat, Jul 13, 2024